I read today an article on SunnyNews of Vashi, Navi mumbai india by Mr Thomas on 'Janata dharbar..' ans is extra constitutionalism, that durbar adopts. True view expressed by writer from USA Mr.Thomas.

I fully support his view that Janatha Durbar should be excised by Constitutional Courts in India, Constitution of India never granted such illusory ideas of justice. If this continues, naturally peoples' courts will surface not clandestinely as of now by Naxalites but openly by people.

If politicians in power are allowed by a Nelson's eye by Judiciary in India, that if does not take cognizance of this durbar menace, then things will just go out of hand.

There i also read an editorial in the latest issue dated 16th December issue, that a commoner attacked Sharad Pawar a Union Minster by openly slapping him in public and that man is put behind bars and tortured by police.

The question arises why the court did not give him bail. He got angry at the minister's food administration fiasco. He is not a terrorist but he was a person affected by exorbitant prices of food grains. The question arises if a person questions a politician for his genuine essentials for living like food, will the law allow that man be incarcerated?

So it is high time peoples' issues are not solved by government and not questioned by law courts, will it not lead to anarchy.

So, readers of this blog should raise a hue and cry and bring it to the notice of constitutional courts to suo motu take up issues by Writ law under judicial activism, as the janata durbars misused the durbars o punish common man by summary action illegallly supported by lolice and other executive authorities.

PM MMS said to give him time to bring the economy on tracks can any believe him if he does not take cognizance of these so called janata durbars and police arresting common man like the one who slapped Sharad Pawar by not allowing him bail, as he wanted food at affordable prices which that minister consistently failed.